UV correction in make_beam for 1240826896/1241518520/1165080856
- 1 1240826896 (J0835-4510, Vela)
- 1.1 Processing with VCSTools, with different phase slopes applied
- 1.2 Processing 1240826896 (Vela) with VCSBeam
- 1.2.1 Without any correction applied
- 1.2.1.1 Bash commands
- 1.2.1.2 Post-processing commands
- 1.2.2 With Xiang's correction applied to PP
- 1.2.2.1 Post-processing commands
- 1.2.1 Without any correction applied
- 1.3 Calibration solutions
- 1.3.1 1240827912
- 2 1165080856 (J0630-2834)
- 3 1165080856 (J0742-2822)
- 4 Matrix operations
1240826896 (J0835-4510, Vela)
Processing with VCSTools, with different phase slopes applied
> psrplot -g 1600x800 -N 4x1 -p G -j "F 512" -l pol=0-3 J0835-4510_n128_ch157-180.ar.T.newDM67.77203.D
Vela_200MHz_2021withUVcorr.png
> psrplot -g 1600x800 -N 4x1 -p G -j "F 512" -l pol=0-3 J0835-4510_n128_ch157-180.ar.T
Vela_200MHz_2019
> psrplot -g 1600x800 -N 4x1 -p G -j "F 512" -l pol=0-3 J0835-4510_n128_ch133-156.ar.T.newDM67.77203.D
Vela_185MHz_2021withUVcorr.png
> psrplot -g 1600x800 -N 4x1 -p G -j "F 512" -l pol=0-3 J0835-4510_n128_ch133-156.ar.T
Vela_185MHz_2019
Processing 1240826896 (Vela) with VCSBeam
Without any correction applied
With the latest (as of 5 Nov 2021) correction, which is to apply Xiang's correction to the "PP" element of the calibration Jones matrix:
Bash commands
# On Garrawarla
$ module use /pawsey/mwa/software/python3/modulefiles
$ module load vcsbeam
$ make_mwa_tied_array_beam -V
MWA Beamformer v2.18.1_e79c6bd
$ cd /astro/mwavcs/vcs/1240826896/vcsbeam
$ sbatch vcsbeam.sbatch
Post-processing steps:
Post-processing commands
$ /pawsey/mwa/singularity/dspsr/dspsr.sif dspsr -c 0.08940704866643866 -D 67.97 -b 128 -L 10 -A -K -cont -U 600 G0034_1240826896_08:35:20.61_-45:10:34.87_ch133-156_000?.fits
$ singularity run -B ~/.Xauthority /pawsey/mwa/singularity/psrchive_tempo2/psrchive_tempo2.sif psrplot -N 4x1 -p G -l pol=0-3 -j T -j "F 512" -g 1000x500 -D 2019-05-02-10\:08\:00_no_correction.png/png 2019-05-02-10\:08\:00.arThis produces the following:
(Running pdmp on the resulting archive indicates that a better DM might be 67.814.)
With Xiang's correction applied to PP
Same steps as above, except that the beamforming command is:
Post-processing commands
$ /pawsey/mwa/singularity/dspsr/dspsr.sif dspsr -c 0.08940704866643866 -D 67.97 -b 128 -L 10 -A -K -cont -U 600 G0034_1240826896_08:35:20.61_-45:10:34.87_ch133-156_000?.fits
$ singularity run -B ~/.Xauthority /pawsey/mwa/singularity/psrchive_tempo2/psrchive_tempo2.sif psrplot -N 4x1 -p G -l pol=0-3 -j T -j "F 512" -g 1000x500 -D 2019-05-02-10\:08\:00_with_correction_applied_to_PP.png/png 2019-05-02-10\:08\:00.arThis produces the following:
Calibration solutions
1240827912
The (coarse channel) solutions directly from the RTS (phases only):
Using vcsbeam v2.18 (mwalib must be >= v0.11.0):
$ mwa_plot_calibration -m /PATH/TO/1240826896_metafits_ppds.fits -c /PATH/TO/1240827912.metafits -C . -N 24 -R NONE -U 0,0 -X > solution.txt
$ /PATH/TO/plot_calibration.py solution.txtAfter applying the following three corrections:
Divide the phases by a reference antenna (LGB8)
Zero the cross terms (PQ and QP)
Apply the phase slope correction to the top left matrix element
Using vcsbeam v2.18 (mwalib must be >= v0.11.0):
$ mwa_plot_calibration -m /PATH/TO/1240826896_metafits_ppds.fits -c /PATH/TO/1240827912.metafits -C . -N 24 > solution.txt
$ /PATH/TO/plot_calibration.py solution.txt
1165080856 (J0630-2834)
J0630_1165080856_2021withUVcorr
J0630_1165080856_2019
1165080856 (J0742-2822)
J0742_1165080856_2021withUVcorr
J0742_1165080856_2019
Matrix operations
Order:
B C P V PH CH BH
P for PQ
C for Calibration
B for Primary Beam
[C P] = J for Jones Matrix