2022-09-08

2022-09-08

Present:

  • @Mengyao Xue 

  • Willem van Straten

  • @Steven Tremblay (Deactivated) 

  • Fu Qiuyang

  • @Ian Morrison (Deactivated) 

  • @Gayatri Aniruddha (Unlicensed) 

  • @Susmita Sett 

  • @Samuel James McSweeney 

  • @Ramesh Bhat 

  • @Bradley Meyers 

  • @Garvit Grover 

  • Jared Moseley

  • Ryan Shannon

  • @Zhongli Zhang 

Minutes

Introductions

Jared and Quiyang

Ramesh's update

  • Overview of SMART survey

    • ~ 3PB of data, compute-heavy

    • First pass = 10-mins of data per pointing

    • 3 new pulsars, 3 papers

  • MWA updates

    • Aging hardware, correlator upgrades, etc.

    • No 2022B semester – MWA board approved

    • SMART still supported, so opportunities for taking the rest of the data will hopefully become available next year

    • Pulsars and Fast Transients Science Working Group now official

    • MWAX commissioning and other proposals still ongoing

    • Parkes and GMRT proposals still on the boil

    • ADACS proposals mixed success

  • PSR #4

    • Detected, and initially thought to be a new pulsar

    • DM inconsistent across multiple previous detections!!

  • PSR #2 paper is published

  • SMART description paper in 2nd (final) review period

  • Tasks ahead

    • Ensuring processing tasks are assigned to people

Bradley's update

  • PSR #2 has now been phase connected

  • Standard timing procedure, except that nulls have to  be "masked", so that best S/N was achieved for each observation

  • Final ephemeris now available, but will be improved with the addition of even more archival observation.

  • Done with both TEMPO and pint

 

  • RB: GMRT observations haven't been folded in yet

  • RB: Parul will be doing further followup on subpulse drifting analysis

    • WvS: Polarisation included in analysis?

    • RB: Data is full-pol, but DSPSR can't yet handle data format

Mengyao's update

  • PSR #1 and #2 scintillation

    • Both very high Galactic latitude → interesting scintillation studies

  • FAST obs of PSR #1 – measurable scintillation bandwidth, but very large, so possibly not ideal frequency range (~1.0 - 1.5 GHz)

  • Used Daniel Reardon's scintools for analysis

    • Autocorrelation function

  • Parul did same analysis for PSR #2 (using uGMRT Band 3 data)

 

  • RB: FAST may not be ideal for PSR #1, but it is the only telescope that can do it

Jared's update

  • Intro to his project: Optimisation of the MWA's High Time Resolution mode data processing

    • MWAX data is channelised differently

    • VCSBeam reproduces PFB for fine channelisation

    • Uses MPI and NVIDIA CUDA for acceleration

    • Output is currently incorrect

    • Profiling has not been done

    • Not yet ported to (e.g.) AMD GPUs

  • Test data set

    • Points to incorrect normalisation on coarse channels

 

  • WvS: Could the problem be some kind of delay-induced loss of coherence?

  • ST: Is PFB being reproduced "warts and all"?

Garvit's update

  • Project work: looking for long-period pulsars

  • First stage: simulating data with different periods, nulling fractions, nulling durations, S/N per pulse

    • Compare FFA and SPS to see which simulations can be detected

    • Example: high null duration, low null fraction... but also different regions of parameter space tested

  • Initial conclusion:

    • SPS needed to catch pulsars in some parameter spaces

    • Same for FFA

 

  • WvS: A bit surprised that SPS is not significantly better than FFA for high null fractions

    • GG: FFA has lots of knobs – will be playing around to see how it changes things

    • BM: Also note that current tests are low single pulse S/N

Susmita's update

  • Database updates

  • Still advertising for more people to join in pulsar hunting (currently Monday 15:00 AWST)

  • Documentation guide on Nick's mwa_search GitHub page

    • Whistlestop tour of webapp given – live demo!!

 

  • WvS: is 1 or 5 "good"?

  • SS: 5. But also good to do as group activity, so that we can share wisdom

Qiuyang's update

  • Using AI-based approach

  • J1357-2525

  • Used ubc_AI – an implementation of an image pattern recognition algorithm

  • Tested on known pulsars

  • Possible candidates popped up

    • Generally agreed that these are promising candidates!

  • WvS: What are the training data?

    • QF & MX: What Weiwei used for FAST survey – all real data (not simulated)

  • BM: Also GBNCC use a similar thing

Bradley's update

  • New GitHub repository for deep pass planning: https://github.com/CIRA-Pulsars-and-Transients-Group/SMART_deep_planning (private – request access from Bradley)

  • Database schema will be accordingly updated

    • Examples: better classification of candidates, additional metadata, ...

    • Goal: Make sure that all deep pass processing is set up so that the database is definitive.

  • SM: ADACS proposals still on the cards

Ramesh's update

  • PFT policy

  • Available on MWA Wiki (Science Information)

  • SMART policy still in progress – we need some guideline in the near future

    • Coordination of project allocation and paper authorship and student projects

  • Data access policy is inherited from MWA policy

 

  • ZZ: specific use case question... My student projects – what is the policy?

  • RB: Read the MWA policy. (tl;dr) students have to be MWA student members. Difference between Open Access tie vs Guaranteed Time.