2022-09-08

Present:

Minutes

Introductions

Jared and Quiyang

Ramesh's update

  • Overview of SMART survey
    • ~ 3PB of data, compute-heavy
    • First pass = 10-mins of data per pointing
    • 3 new pulsars, 3 papers
  • MWA updates
    • Aging hardware, correlator upgrades, etc.
    • No 2022B semester – MWA board approved
    • SMART still supported, so opportunities for taking the rest of the data will hopefully become available next year
    • Pulsars and Fast Transients Science Working Group now official
    • MWAX commissioning and other proposals still ongoing
    • Parkes and GMRT proposals still on the boil
    • ADACS proposals mixed success
  • PSR #4
    • Detected, and initially thought to be a new pulsar
    • DM inconsistent across multiple previous detections!!
  • PSR #2 paper is published
  • SMART description paper in 2nd (final) review period
  • Tasks ahead
    • Ensuring processing tasks are assigned to people

Bradley's update

  • PSR #2 has now been phase connected
  • Standard timing procedure, except that nulls have to  be "masked", so that best S/N was achieved for each observation
  • Final ephemeris now available, but will be improved with the addition of even more archival observation.
  • Done with both TEMPO and pint


  • RB: GMRT observations haven't been folded in yet
  • RB: Parul will be doing further followup on subpulse drifting analysis
    • WvS: Polarisation included in analysis?
    • RB: Data is full-pol, but DSPSR can't yet handle data format

Mengyao's update

  • PSR #1 and #2 scintillation
    • Both very high Galactic latitude → interesting scintillation studies
  • FAST obs of PSR #1 – measurable scintillation bandwidth, but very large, so possibly not ideal frequency range (~1.0 - 1.5 GHz)
  • Used Daniel Reardon's scintools for analysis
    • Autocorrelation function
  • Parul did same analysis for PSR #2 (using uGMRT Band 3 data)


  • RB: FAST may not be ideal for PSR #1, but it is the only telescope that can do it

Jared's update

  • Intro to his project: Optimisation of the MWA's High Time Resolution mode data processing
    • MWAX data is channelised differently
    • VCSBeam reproduces PFB for fine channelisation
    • Uses MPI and NVIDIA CUDA for acceleration
    • Output is currently incorrect
    • Profiling has not been done
    • Not yet ported to (e.g.) AMD GPUs
  • Test data set
    • Points to incorrect normalisation on coarse channels


  • WvS: Could the problem be some kind of delay-induced loss of coherence?
  • ST: Is PFB being reproduced "warts and all"?

Garvit's update

  • Project work: looking for long-period pulsars
  • First stage: simulating data with different periods, nulling fractions, nulling durations, S/N per pulse
    • Compare FFA and SPS to see which simulations can be detected
    • Example: high null duration, low null fraction... but also different regions of parameter space tested
  • Initial conclusion:
    • SPS needed to catch pulsars in some parameter spaces
    • Same for FFA


  • WvS: A bit surprised that SPS is not significantly better than FFA for high null fractions
    • GG: FFA has lots of knobs – will be playing around to see how it changes things
    • BM: Also note that current tests are low single pulse S/N

Susmita's update

  • Database updates
  • Still advertising for more people to join in pulsar hunting (currently Monday 15:00 AWST)
  • Documentation guide on Nick's mwa_search GitHub page
    • Whistlestop tour of webapp given – live demo!!


  • WvS: is 1 or 5 "good"?
  • SS: 5. But also good to do as group activity, so that we can share wisdom

Qiuyang's update

  • Using AI-based approach
  • J1357-2525
  • Used ubc_AI – an implementation of an image pattern recognition algorithm
  • Tested on known pulsars
  • Possible candidates popped up
    • Generally agreed that these are promising candidates!
  • WvS: What are the training data?
    • QF & MX: What Weiwei used for FAST survey – all real data (not simulated)
  • BM: Also GBNCC use a similar thing

Bradley's update

  • New GitHub repository for deep pass planning: https://github.com/CIRA-Pulsars-and-Transients-Group/SMART_deep_planning (private – request access from Bradley)
  • Database schema will be accordingly updated
    • Examples: better classification of candidates, additional metadata, ...
    • Goal: Make sure that all deep pass processing is set up so that the database is definitive.
  • SM: ADACS proposals still on the cards

Ramesh's update

  • PFT policy
  • Available on MWA Wiki (Science Information)
  • SMART policy still in progress – we need some guideline in the near future
    • Coordination of project allocation and paper authorship and student projects
  • Data access policy is inherited from MWA policy


  • ZZ: specific use case question... My student projects – what is the policy?
  • RB: Read the MWA policy. (tl;dr) students have to be MWA student members. Difference between Open Access tie vs Guaranteed Time.