2022-09-08
Present:
@Mengyao Xue
Willem van Straten
@Steven Tremblay (Deactivated)
Fu Qiuyang
@Ian Morrison (Deactivated)
@Gayatri Aniruddha (Unlicensed)
@Susmita Sett
@Samuel James McSweeney
@Ramesh Bhat
@Bradley Meyers
@Garvit Grover
Jared Moseley
Ryan Shannon
@Zhongli Zhang
Minutes
Introductions
Jared and Quiyang
Ramesh's update
Overview of SMART survey
~ 3PB of data, compute-heavy
First pass = 10-mins of data per pointing
3 new pulsars, 3 papers
MWA updates
Aging hardware, correlator upgrades, etc.
No 2022B semester – MWA board approved
SMART still supported, so opportunities for taking the rest of the data will hopefully become available next year
Pulsars and Fast Transients Science Working Group now official
MWAX commissioning and other proposals still ongoing
Parkes and GMRT proposals still on the boil
ADACS proposals mixed success
PSR #4
Detected, and initially thought to be a new pulsar
DM inconsistent across multiple previous detections!!
PSR #2 paper is published
SMART description paper in 2nd (final) review period
Tasks ahead
Ensuring processing tasks are assigned to people
Bradley's update
PSR #2 has now been phase connected
Standard timing procedure, except that nulls have to be "masked", so that best S/N was achieved for each observation
Final ephemeris now available, but will be improved with the addition of even more archival observation.
Done with both TEMPO and pint
RB: GMRT observations haven't been folded in yet
RB: Parul will be doing further followup on subpulse drifting analysis
WvS: Polarisation included in analysis?
RB: Data is full-pol, but DSPSR can't yet handle data format
Mengyao's update
PSR #1 and #2 scintillation
Both very high Galactic latitude → interesting scintillation studies
FAST obs of PSR #1 – measurable scintillation bandwidth, but very large, so possibly not ideal frequency range (~1.0 - 1.5 GHz)
Used Daniel Reardon's scintools for analysis
Autocorrelation function
Parul did same analysis for PSR #2 (using uGMRT Band 3 data)
RB: FAST may not be ideal for PSR #1, but it is the only telescope that can do it
Jared's update
Intro to his project: Optimisation of the MWA's High Time Resolution mode data processing
MWAX data is channelised differently
VCSBeam reproduces PFB for fine channelisation
Uses MPI and NVIDIA CUDA for acceleration
Output is currently incorrect
Profiling has not been done
Not yet ported to (e.g.) AMD GPUs
Test data set
Points to incorrect normalisation on coarse channels
WvS: Could the problem be some kind of delay-induced loss of coherence?
ST: Is PFB being reproduced "warts and all"?
Garvit's update
Project work: looking for long-period pulsars
First stage: simulating data with different periods, nulling fractions, nulling durations, S/N per pulse
Compare FFA and SPS to see which simulations can be detected
Example: high null duration, low null fraction... but also different regions of parameter space tested
Initial conclusion:
SPS needed to catch pulsars in some parameter spaces
Same for FFA
WvS: A bit surprised that SPS is not significantly better than FFA for high null fractions
GG: FFA has lots of knobs – will be playing around to see how it changes things
BM: Also note that current tests are low single pulse S/N
Susmita's update
Database updates
Still advertising for more people to join in pulsar hunting (currently Monday 15:00 AWST)
Documentation guide on Nick's mwa_search GitHub page
Whistlestop tour of webapp given – live demo!!
WvS: is 1 or 5 "good"?
SS: 5. But also good to do as group activity, so that we can share wisdom
Qiuyang's update
Using AI-based approach
J1357-2525
Used ubc_AI – an implementation of an image pattern recognition algorithm
Tested on known pulsars
Possible candidates popped up
Generally agreed that these are promising candidates!
WvS: What are the training data?
QF & MX: What Weiwei used for FAST survey – all real data (not simulated)
BM: Also GBNCC use a similar thing
Bradley's update
New GitHub repository for deep pass planning: https://github.com/CIRA-Pulsars-and-Transients-Group/SMART_deep_planning (private – request access from Bradley)
Database schema will be accordingly updated
Examples: better classification of candidates, additional metadata, ...
Goal: Make sure that all deep pass processing is set up so that the database is definitive.
SM: ADACS proposals still on the cards
Ramesh's update
PFT policy
Available on MWA Wiki (Science Information)
SMART policy still in progress – we need some guideline in the near future
Coordination of project allocation and paper authorship and student projects
Data access policy is inherited from MWA policy
ZZ: specific use case question... My student projects – what is the policy?
RB: Read the MWA policy. (tl;dr) students have to be MWA student members. Difference between Open Access tie vs Guaranteed Time.