2022-09-08
Present:
- Mengyao Xue
- Willem van Straten
- Steven Tremblay (Unlicensed)
- Fu Qiuyang
- Ian Morrison (Unlicensed)
- Gayatri Aniruddha
- Susmita Sett
- Samuel James McSweeney
- Ramesh Bhat
- Bradley Meyers
- Garvit Grover
- Jared Moseley
- Ryan Shannon
- Zhongli Zhang
Minutes
Introductions
Jared and Quiyang
Ramesh's update
- Overview of SMART survey
- ~ 3PB of data, compute-heavy
- First pass = 10-mins of data per pointing
- 3 new pulsars, 3 papers
- MWA updates
- Aging hardware, correlator upgrades, etc.
- No 2022B semester – MWA board approved
- SMART still supported, so opportunities for taking the rest of the data will hopefully become available next year
- Pulsars and Fast Transients Science Working Group now official
- MWAX commissioning and other proposals still ongoing
- Parkes and GMRT proposals still on the boil
- ADACS proposals mixed success
- PSR #4
- Detected, and initially thought to be a new pulsar
- DM inconsistent across multiple previous detections!!
- PSR #2 paper is published
- SMART description paper in 2nd (final) review period
- Tasks ahead
- Ensuring processing tasks are assigned to people
Bradley's update
- PSR #2 has now been phase connected
- Standard timing procedure, except that nulls have to be "masked", so that best S/N was achieved for each observation
- Final ephemeris now available, but will be improved with the addition of even more archival observation.
- Done with both TEMPO and pint
- RB: GMRT observations haven't been folded in yet
- RB: Parul will be doing further followup on subpulse drifting analysis
- WvS: Polarisation included in analysis?
- RB: Data is full-pol, but DSPSR can't yet handle data format
Mengyao's update
- PSR #1 and #2 scintillation
- Both very high Galactic latitude → interesting scintillation studies
- FAST obs of PSR #1 – measurable scintillation bandwidth, but very large, so possibly not ideal frequency range (~1.0 - 1.5 GHz)
- Used Daniel Reardon's scintools for analysis
- Autocorrelation function
- Parul did same analysis for PSR #2 (using uGMRT Band 3 data)
- RB: FAST may not be ideal for PSR #1, but it is the only telescope that can do it
Jared's update
- Intro to his project: Optimisation of the MWA's High Time Resolution mode data processing
- MWAX data is channelised differently
- VCSBeam reproduces PFB for fine channelisation
- Uses MPI and NVIDIA CUDA for acceleration
- Output is currently incorrect
- Profiling has not been done
- Not yet ported to (e.g.) AMD GPUs
- Test data set
- Points to incorrect normalisation on coarse channels
- WvS: Could the problem be some kind of delay-induced loss of coherence?
- ST: Is PFB being reproduced "warts and all"?
Garvit's update
- Project work: looking for long-period pulsars
- First stage: simulating data with different periods, nulling fractions, nulling durations, S/N per pulse
- Compare FFA and SPS to see which simulations can be detected
- Example: high null duration, low null fraction... but also different regions of parameter space tested
- Initial conclusion:
- SPS needed to catch pulsars in some parameter spaces
- Same for FFA
- WvS: A bit surprised that SPS is not significantly better than FFA for high null fractions
- GG: FFA has lots of knobs – will be playing around to see how it changes things
- BM: Also note that current tests are low single pulse S/N
Susmita's update
- Database updates
- Still advertising for more people to join in pulsar hunting (currently Monday 15:00 AWST)
- Documentation guide on Nick's mwa_search GitHub page
- Whistlestop tour of webapp given – live demo!!
- WvS: is 1 or 5 "good"?
- SS: 5. But also good to do as group activity, so that we can share wisdom
Qiuyang's update
- Using AI-based approach
- J1357-2525
- Used ubc_AI – an implementation of an image pattern recognition algorithm
- Tested on known pulsars
- Possible candidates popped up
- Generally agreed that these are promising candidates!
- WvS: What are the training data?
- QF & MX: What Weiwei used for FAST survey – all real data (not simulated)
- BM: Also GBNCC use a similar thing
Bradley's update
- New GitHub repository for deep pass planning: https://github.com/CIRA-Pulsars-and-Transients-Group/SMART_deep_planning (private – request access from Bradley)
- Database schema will be accordingly updated
- Examples: better classification of candidates, additional metadata, ...
- Goal: Make sure that all deep pass processing is set up so that the database is definitive.
- SM: ADACS proposals still on the cards
Ramesh's update
- PFT policy
- Available on MWA Wiki (Science Information)
- SMART policy still in progress – we need some guideline in the near future
- Coordination of project allocation and paper authorship and student projects
- Data access policy is inherited from MWA policy
- ZZ: specific use case question... My student projects – what is the policy?
- RB: Read the MWA policy. (tl;dr) students have to be MWA student members. Difference between Open Access tie vs Guaranteed Time.